To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee - : Statements and Themes :: Free Essay Writer

Statements and Themes of To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee makes round direct statements about the thoughts of the public during the mid-nineteen thirties. The simplest way to make a statement in the novel is done the thoughts of Scout. Scout shapes her character from her fathers advice. One of the principle set Scout attains from Atticus appears at the end of the novel when she states, Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a spell until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them (279). Lee demonstrates the difference between an adults understanding of the world around him and a childs understanding of his milieu by creating the character Dolphus Raymond. Dolphus states Secretly, Miss Finch, Im not much of a drinker, but you see they adults could never, never understand that I live like I do because thats the way I want to live (201). Scout does not understand why Dolphus trusts two children with his secret over an adult and he replies, Because youre chil dren and you can understand it (201). Dolphus teaches that it is not until one loses his innocence that he looks on things with prejudice. Stating facts proves to be beneficial when one is trying to express a point however, the best way to learn is through experience. Atticus gains respect from his children and is capable of teaching them good reputes because he allows them to experience some of life for themselves. For example, both Jem and Scout are allowed to walk into townsfolk on their own, play by themselves in the yard, and cavort around the neighborhood with Dill during the summer. Atticus allots this freedom and in turn, Jem and Scout gain a common sense of independence and responsibility. Atticus encouragement of Jems visits to Mrs. Dubose, which proves to be an excellent learning environment for Jem. Not tho does he learn how to behave in a gentleman-like manner, but he learns of a courage that exists without physical violence. Atticus also permits the children to wa tch the trial of Tom Robinson. Bob Ewells testimony exhibits poor language and a low value system. His mannerisms are contrary to those of Tom Robinson, who portrays himself as a helpful and respectful man. The trial of Tom Robinson proves to be the most beneficial experience the children could have. Not only do they see their father in a different setting, but they are able to define what constitutes a decent merciful being and what amounts to human trash.